1. 毕业设计（论文）主要目标：
研究区间模糊共识决策有很大意义，它为专家参与有效性的理论反思提供另一种视角。基于不同理论视角的研究都将问题归结于利益诉求的表达，在选用哪些专家对问题进行决策时，参与结构的开放性会影响参与结构的有效性。是因为专家们不同学历水平、权利地位而不同的权重使决策过程不能达成共识，参与决策的过程会因为无法协调的矛盾而走向失败。这引起了我们队决策结构的反思，对共识决策形成的机理的探索将为决策结构的反思提供另一种可能。在研究共识决策的过程中，我们综合了关于共识研究和模糊研究的相关成果，涉及多个学科。在本文的研究中，涉及到了MATLAB、管理学、经济学等学科，有助于推动共识构建理论与实践的发展。一般情况下，共识决策的达成需要不断修改多个专家的初始意见并使之趋于一致，在对专家意见进行集结的时候由于利用不同的距离共识得到的共识的程度不同，寻找适合一个群体决策的距离公式在计算共识水平是群体决策的关键一步，如何选择最佳距离公式专从而得到最佳的群体共识目标往往是人们所关注的焦点问题，这也是本文所研究的内容，即研究群体集结时的距离公式具有重要的意义。尽管共识决策已经得到了很大的发展，但仍有一些点需要深入研究完善。在中外的研究成果中，大都涉及共识决策的方法以及如何进行最优决策的问题。往往较少研究当决策值是模糊区间的时的共识决策问题，本文研究的主要内容是比较不同的距离公式的区间模糊共识决策模型以及对其用MATLAB进行实验分析，最后得出最佳的距离公式。
2. 毕业设计（论文）主要内容：
本文主要分为三个部分，主要研究内容如下：
一．绪论。
介绍本文的研究背景、研究目标与研究意义，以及本文的研究思路，交代研究涉及的内容。首先介绍了模糊共识决策的研究背景然后是国内外研究现状，包括模糊群体决策方法研究现状和模糊共识群体决策方法研究现状。
3. 主要参考文献
| [1] 朱佳俊，郑建国．群决策理论，方法及其应用研究的综述与展望[J]．管理学报，2009，6：1131-1136. [2] 彭勇行．管理决策分析[M]．北京：科学出版社，2000. [3]Mianabadi H, Afshar A.Fuzzy group decision making to select the best alternative for development of groundwater resources[C]//2009 Sixth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery. IEEE, 2009: 307-311. [4]Kwok R C W, Ma J, Zhou D. Improving group decision making: a fuzzy GSS approach[J]. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, IEEE Transactions on, 2002, 32(1): 54-63. [5]Yan G, Liu C, Shao Z.Analysis of influencing factors for the grey multi-attribute group decision making[C]//Grey Systems and Intelligent Services, 2009. GSIS 2009. IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2009: 1081-1086. [6]Naim S, Hagras H. A hybrid approach for multi-criteria group decision making based on interval type-2 fuzzy logic and intuitionistic fuzzy evaluation[C]//Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), 2012 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2012: 1-8. [7]I. Palomares, F. J. Estrella, L. Martnez, et al. Consensus under a fuzzy context: Taxonomy, analysis framework AFRYCA and experimental case of study[J].Information Fusion, 2014, 20: 252-271. [8]B. Sun, W. Ma. An approach to consensus measurement of linguistic preference relations inmulti-attributegroupdecision making and application[J]. Omega, 2015, 51: 83-92. [9]Y. Xu, K. W. Li, H. Wang. Distance-based consensus models for fuzzy and multiplicative preferencerelations [J]. Information Sciences, 2013, 253: 56-73. [10]Y. Jiang, Z. Xu, X. Yu. Compatibility measures and consensus models for group decision making with intuitionistic multiplicative preference relations[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2013, 13: 2075-2086. [11]L. Zhang, T. Li, X. Xu. Consensus model for multiple criteria group decision making under intuitionisticfuzzy environment[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2014, 57: 127-135. [12]J. Wu, F. Chiclana, E. Herrera-Viedma. Trust based consensus model for social network in an incomplete ling[26] S. Khorshid. Soft consensus model based on coincidence between positive and negative idealdegrees of agreement under a group decision-making fuzzy environment[J]. Exp. Syst. Appl, 2010, 37: 3977-3985. [13] J. Chen, C. Chen, C. Wang, X. Jiang. Measuring soft consensus in uncertain linguistic group decision-making based on deviation and overlap degrees[J]. Int. J. Innov. Manage, Inform. Product. 2011, 2: 25-33. [14] S. Alonso, E. Herrera-Viedma, F. Chiclana, F. Herrera, A Web Based Consensus Support System for Group Decision Making Problems and incomplete preferences[J]. Information Sciences, 2010,180(23): 4477-4495. [15]G. Bordogna, M. Fedrizzi, G. Pasi. A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators[J]. IEEE Trans. Syst, Man Cybernet, Part A: Syst. Hum. 1997, 27 (1): 126-133. [16]L. Rosell, M. Snchez,N. Agell, et al. Usingconsensusanddistancesbetweengeneralizedmulti-attribute linguistic assessments for group decision-making[J]. Information Fusion, 2014, 17: 83-92. [17]J. M. T. Garca, M. J. Moral, M. A. Martnez, et al. A consensus model for group decision making problems withlinguisticinterval fuzzy preference relations[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, 39: 10022-10030. [18] J. Wu, F. Chiclana. A social network analysis trust–consensus based approach to group decision-making problems with interval-valued fuzzy reciprocal preference relations[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2014, 59: 97-107. [19]I. J. Prez, F. J. Cabrerizo, S. Alonso, et al. A new consensus model for group decision making problems with non-homogeneous experts[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics: Systems, 2014, 44(4): 494-498. [20]H. Liang, C.-C. Li, Y. Dong, et al. The fusion process ofinterval opinions based on the dynamic bounded confidence[J]. Information Fusion, 2016, 29: 112-119. [21]X. Zhang, Z. Xu. Soft computing based on maximizing consensus and fuzzy TOPSIS approach to interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2015, 26: 42-56. uistic information context[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2015, 35: 827-839. [22]Li S, Oikonomou G, Tryfonas T, et al. A distributed consensus algorithm for decision making in service-oriented internet of things[J]. Industrial Informatics, IEEE Transactions on, 2014, 10(2): 1461-1468. [23]Liu Z. The proportion of leaders needed in the consensus decision-making[C]//Decision and Control (CDC), 2012 IEEE 51st Annual Conference on. IEEE, 2012: 3997-4002. [24]Liu Z. Consensus decision-making of animal groups in motion[C]//Intelligent Control and Automation (WCICA), 2012 10th World Congress on. IEEE, 2012: 952-957. [25]Gong Z W, Xu X, Guo C. The distance measure on consensus decision making based on primal-dual programming models[C]//Grey Systems and Intelligent Services, 2013 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2013: 359-361. [26]Palomares I, Martinez L, Herrera F. A consensus model to detect and manage noncooperative behaviors in large-scale group decision making[J]. Fuzzy Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 2014, 22(3): 516-530. [27]Zhang H, Dong Y, Herrera-Viedma E. Consensus reaching model with individual satisfactions in group decision making[C]//Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), 2015 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2015: 1-7. [28]DeCarvalho F,Brito H H.Dynamic clustering of interval data based on L2 distance [J]. Comput. Statist , 2006, 21(2) :231-250 [29] 党耀国，刘思峰，刘斌．基于区间数的多指标灰靶决策模型的研究[J]．中国工程科学，2005,7（8）：31-35．
|
以上是毕业论文任务书，课题毕业论文、开题报告、外文翻译、程序设计、图纸设计等资料可联系客服协助查找。
